ACP09
Material description
Material ID: ACP09
Material type: Aluminium composite panel with a core consisting of polyethylene (PE) modified with vinyl acetate (VA) and a fire retardant.
Polymer: Polyethylene modified with vinyl acetate (24%)
Additives (fire retardants, fillers or traces of inorganic elements): Magnesium Hydroxide (71%), Calcium Carbonate (4%), Sodium (1%), Silicon (1%), traces of other elements (<1%)
Core thickness: 3.11mm
Thickness of single metal skin: 0.5mm

Table 1. Estimated mass concentration of compounds.
| Compound | Mass Concentration (%) |
|---|---|
| Polyethylene modified with vinyl acetate (PE-VA) | 24 |
| Magnesium Hydroxide (Mg(OH)2) | 71 |
| Calcium Carbonate (CaCO3) | 4 |
| Sodium (Na) | 1 |
| Silicon (Si) | 1 |
| Traces of iron (Fe) | <1 |
| Traces of potassium (K) | <1 |
| Traces of aluminium (Al) | <1 |

Figure 1 . FTIR spectra: Absorbance percentage versus wavenumber from the sample.

Figure 2. FTIR spectra: Absorbance percentage versus wavenumber from the sample and the identified compounds.
A.2 Energy Dispersive X-Ray Fluorescence (EDXRF)
Table 2. Inorganic elements and their mass concentration identified with EDXRF.
| Element | Mass Concentration (%) |
|---|---|
| Mg | 23 |
| Ca | 3 |
| Si | 1 |
| Na | <1 |
| Fe | <1 |
| K | <1 |
| Al | <1 |

Figure 3. EDXRF spectra. Counts vs energy. Identified elements are shown as vertical lines.
B. Thermogravimetric analysis
Table 3. Mass fraction of residue after thermal decomposition.
| Condition | Fraction of mass residue at 800°C |
|---|---|
| Non-oxidative (nitrogen) | 0.49 |
| Oxidative (air) | 0.48 |
Table 4. Temperature and amplitude of main peaks in non-oxidative conditions.
| Peak ID | Temperature peak (°C) | Amplitude of peak (°C-1) |
|---|---|---|
| Peak 1 | 395 | 2.71 x 10-3 |
| Peak 2 | 482 | 7.44 x 10-3 |
| Peak 3 | 692 | 3.6 x 10-4 |
Table 5. Temperature and amplitude of main peaks in oxidative conditions.
| Peak ID | Temperature peak (°C) | Amplitude of peak (°C-1) |
|---|---|---|
| Peak 1 | 412 | 4.34 x 10-3 |
| Peak 2 | 458 | 8.1 x 10-3 |
| Peak 3 | 675 | 4.1 x 10-4 |

Figure 4. Normalised mass (solid line) and derivative of the normalised mass (dashed line) in 150 ml min-1 of nitrogen and a heating rate of 20°C min-1.

Figure 5. Normalised mass (solid line) and derivative of the normalised mass (dashed line) in 150 ml min-1 of air and a heating rate of 20°C min-1 .
C. Gross Heat of Combustion
Table 7. Gross Heat of Combustion individual results for sample.| Trial | ΔHc [kJ g-1] |
|---|---|
| Trial 1 | 13.23 |
| Trial 2 | 13.26 |
| Trial 3 | 13.22 |
| Average | 13.24 |
| Std dev | 0.02 |
D. Ignition parameters
Table 8. Summary of ignition parameters for sample.| Critical heat flux for ignition | Ignition temperature | Total heat transfer coefficient of losses | Apparent thermal inertia |
|---|---|---|---|
| q̇″cr [kW m−2] | Tig [°C] | hr [W m-2 K-1] | kρc [kW2 m-4 K-2 s] |
| 18 | 407 | 41.90 | 1.856 |

Figure 6. Time-to-ignition vs incident radiant heat flux for samples.
E. Burning behaviour
Table 9. Summary of key burning behaviour metrics.
| Heat flux | Test | Time to ignition | Fraction of mass residue | Peak heat release rate | Total energy released |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| q̇″inc [kW m-2] | tig [s] | mres [-] | q̇″p [kW m-2] | Qt [MJ m-2] | |
| 35 kW m-2 | |||||
| Test 1 | 179 | 0.50 | 142.84 | 72.68 | |
| Test 2 | 187 | 0.49 | 126.59 | 73.66 | |
| Avg | 183 | 0.50 | 134.72 | 73.17 | |
| 50 kW m-2 | |||||
| Test 1 | 104 | 0.48 | 184.26 | 74.07 | |
| Test 2 | 101 | 0.48 | 186.04 | 75.81 | |
| Avg | 102 | 0.48 | 185.15 | 74.94 | |
| 60 kW m-2 | |||||
| Test 1 | 86 | 0.56 | 203.91 | 74.38 | |
| Test 2 | 80 | 0.47 | 203.85 | 73.30 | |
| Avg | 83 | 0.52 | 203.88 | 73.84 | |
| 80 kW m-2 | |||||
| Test 1 | - | - | - | - | |
| Test 2 | - | - | - | - | |
| Avg | - | - | - | - |

Figure 7. Normalised mass loss over time for samples tested with 35, 50, 60 and 80 kW m-2.

Figure 8. Heat release rate per unit area over time for samples tested with 35, 50, 60 and 80 kW m-2.
| Test | ΔHc [kJ g-1] |
|---|---|
| 35 kW m-2 (Test 1) | 30.45 |
| 35 kW m-2 (Test 2) | 30.87 |
| 50 kW m-2 (Test 1) | 30.54 |
| 50 kW m-2 (Test 2) | 31.70 |
| 60 kW m-2 (Test 1) | 29.33 |
| 60 kW m-2 (Test 2) | 29.67 |
| 80 kW m-2 (Test 1) | - |
| 80 kW m-2 (Test 2) | - |
| Average | 30.43 |
| Std dev | 0.85 |
F. Flame Spread
Table 11. Minimum heat flux for flame spread rate and minimum flame spread rate for sample.| Orientation | q̇″min.spread [kW m-2] | Vf.min [mm s-1] |
|---|---|---|
| Horizontal | 100 | - |
| Vertical | 100 | - |
| Orientation | Trial | (kρcp⁄Φh2)1⁄2 [m3⁄2 s1⁄2 kW-1] | Φ [kW2 m-3] |
|---|---|---|---|
| Horizontal | 1 | 100 | - |
| Horizontal | 2 | 100 | - |
| Vertical | 1 | 100 | - |
| Vertical | 2 | 100 | - |
Sample ignites but fails to establish a uniform flame front and does not spread below the critical heat flux for ignition.