Material description

Material ID: ACP06-S1

Material type: Aluminium composite panel consisting of an egg-box core with polymer adhesive on both sides - S1 - profiled side.

Polymer: Ethylene-vinyl acetate (-%)

Core thickness: 3.46mm

Table 1. Estimated mass concentration of compounds.
CompoundMass Concentration (%)
Ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA)-

A. Material composition identification

A.1 Attenuated total reflection – Fourier transform infrared spectroscopy (ATR-FTIR)

Table 2. FTIR compound identification.
Identified Compounds
Ethylene-vinyl acetate (EVA)

Figure 1 . FTIR spectra: Absorbance percentage versus wavenumber from the sample.

Figure 2. FTIR spectra: Absorbance percentage versus wavenumber from the sample and the identified compounds.

 

B. Thermogravimetric analysis

Table 3. Mass fraction of residue after thermal decomposition.

ConditionFraction of mass residue at 800°C
Non-oxidative (nitrogen)0
Oxidative (air)0

Table 4. Temperature and amplitude of main peaks in non-oxidative conditions.

Peak IDTemperature peak (°C)Amplitude of peak (°C-1)
Peak 14792.354 x 10-2

Table 5. Temperature and amplitude of main peaks in oxidative conditions.

Peak IDTemperature peak (°C)Amplitude of peak (°C-1)
Peak 14178.68 x 10-3

Figure 4. Normalised mass (solid line) and derivative of the normalised mass (dashed line) in 150 ml min-1 of nitrogen and a heating rate of 20°C min-1.

Figure 5. Normalised mass (solid line) and derivative of the normalised mass (dashed line) in 150 ml min-1 of air and a heating rate of 20°C min-1 .

 

C. Gross Heat of Combustion

Table 7. Gross Heat of Combustion individual results for sample.
TrialΔHc [kJ g-1]
Trial 146.21
Trial 246.68
Trial 344.60
Average45.83
Std dev1.09
Additional information:

Only the organic component (the resin) is tested in the bomb calorimeter, as described in Protocols for the Material Library supporting documents.

D. Ignition parameters

Table 8. Summary of ignition parameters for sample.
Critical heat flux for ignitionIgnition temperatureTotal heat transfer coefficient of lossesApparent thermal inertia
q̇″cr [kW m−2]Tig [°C]hr [W m-2 K-1]kρc [kW2 m-4 K-2 s]
30.1051954.300.378

Figure 6. Time-to-ignition vs incident radiant heat flux for samples.

 

E. Burning behaviour

Table 9. Summary of key burning behaviour metrics.

Heat fluxTestTime to ignitionFraction of mass residuePeak heat release rateTotal energy released
q̇″inc [kW m-2] tig [s]mres [-]q̇″p [kW m-2]Qt [MJ m-2]
35 kW m-2
Test 1630.88139.9510.54
Test 2570.90135.657.81
Avg600.89137.809.17
50 kW m-2
Test 1330.88167.6111.16
Test 2240.89155.489.60
Avg280.88161.5510.38
60 kW m-2
Test 1340.91132.979.19
Test 2330.91114.469.33
Avg340.91123.729.26
80 kW m-2
Test 1----
Test 2----
Avg----

Figure 7. Normalised mass loss over time for samples tested with 35, 50, 60 and 80 kW m-2.

Figure 8. Heat release rate per unit area over time for samples tested with 35, 50, 60 and 80 kW m-2.

 

Table 10. Effective Heat of Combustion individual results for sample.
TestΔHc [kJ g-1]
35 kW m-2 (Test 1)34.39
35 kW m-2 (Test 2)29.93
50 kW m-2 (Test 1)34.29
50 kW m-2 (Test 2)34
60 kW m-2 (Test 1)33.88
60 kW m-2 (Test 2)32.90
80 kW m-2 (Test 1)-
80 kW m-2 (Test 2)-
Average33.23
Std dev1.70

F. Flame Spread

Table 11. Minimum heat flux for flame spread rate and minimum flame spread rate for sample.
Orientationq̇″min.spread [kW m-2]Vf.min [mm s-1]
Horizontal171.20
Vertical73

Figure 9. Lateral flame spread rate versus heat flux.

Figure 10. Vertical flame spread rate versus heat flux.

Figure 11. Vf-1/2 as function of q̇″ext in horizontal configuration.

Figure 12. Vf-1/2 as function of q̇″ext in vertical configuration.

Table 12. Flame spread parameter results for sample.

OrientationTrial(kρcpΦh2)12 [m32 s12 kW-1]Φ [kW2 m-3]
Horizontal11.35370.03
Horizontal2--
Vertical1-1000
Vertical2--